Based on 68 sediment samples collected between one-third of a mile and 78 miles from the spill site in two surveys from September to October, 2010, the study is the first to attempt to quantify the extent of damage resulting from the blown-out Macondo well.‘Recovery rates in the deep sea are likely to be slow, on the order of decades or longer,’ the study said.As part of the research, bottom-dwelling organisms referred to as benthos were sifted from the collected sediment and tested for pollution. The sediment itself was also tested for toxins.Chemicals including barium, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and total petroleum hydrocarbons were found to have permeated the sea floor, the study said. Barium is key component in the slurry often referred to as heavy mud, which is used to drill the well. The other chemical compounds are also known to be in the spilled oil, the study said.
Mapping the concentrations of these chemicals found in the sediment enabled scientists to determine the oil spill’s foot print, as well as outline the severity of damage across the spill zone – while at the same time delineating damage caused by natural seepage.This data, in addition to the known differences in biodiversity found across different locations in the Gulf of Mexico, revealed a startling discovery – the more contaminated areas were far less diverse than non-polluted areas. 
